• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 277

PDF Downloaded: 283

Ahmad, Shrivastava, Ayaz, and Khanna: Nora’s lesion of Upper and Lower limb bones- A series of 8 cases


Introduction

Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (BPOP) mainly presents as painless bony swelling and also known as Nora’s lesion. It is a benign surface osteocartilaginous lesion first described by Nora et al in 1983. This condition is seen most commonly in hands followed by feet, long bones, and skull. It is more common in adults in their third to fourth decades. Nora’s lesion has been reported commonly in the proximal and middle phalanges, metacarpal, and metatarsal bones but the involvement of more proximal bones like radius, ulna, tibia fibula is also seen.1

Most of the patients present with painless bony swelling. The etiology of this lesion remains unknown but some authors hypothesized that traumatic events could be the trigger factor for it. 2 However, there are only 30% of the cases reported with a history of trauma. Radiologically it appears as a calcified mass attached to the outer surface of the bone cortex without involvement of the medullary cavity and can mimic an exostosis, an osteochondroma, or a malignant condition. 3

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective study in the period between January 2011 and December 2019. There were a total of 176 cases operated for benign bony swelling of upper and lower limbs during the period. Of these only 8 cases were of BPOP.

Results

Among 8 cases there were 4 cases of females and 4 cases of males. The age of patients varied from 14 years to 36 years and the duration of illness at presentation from 6 months to 3 years. Out of 8 patients, 6 had complaints in the upper limb and 2 in their lower limb.

All the patients with bony swelling of the upper and lower limb were evaluated clinically with detailed history. Among 8 cases there were only 4 cases had a history of trauma. There was no history of trauma in the remaining 4 cases.

Radiological evaluation in all the cases showed calcified mass attached to the surface of the underlying cortex of the bone. There was no sign of periosteal reaction and alteration of the underlying bone.

A presumptive diagnosis of exostosis was made and we decided to perform surgical resection in cases that had immature bones (2 cases with less than 18 years of age). Patients with age more than 18 years underwent MRI.

On MRI all lesions originated from the periosteal aspect with intact cortex and no continuity with the medullary cavity. The margins of the lesion showed low-signal intensity on T1-weighted images and a high-signal intensity on T2-weighted images. The lesion was not enhanced on MRI with gadolinium contrast. As the lesion had no clear continuity with the medulla a presumptive diagnosis of BPOP.

All the cases underwent surgical excision after the pre-operative evaluation. The lesion was excised completely in all the cases with the underlying cortex to avoid any recurrence of the lesion

During follow-up, on every visit radiological evaluation was done to check the recurrence of the lesion. There were 2 cases of recurrence at one year of follow up for which reoperation was done. The details of the patients are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

General characteristics of the included cases

S.No.

Age/Sex

Anatomical Site

Size

Duration of symptoms

History of Trauma

Associated Symptom

Management

Recurrence of lesion

1

24/F

Distal lateral aspect of 5th metacarpal left hand

10x9x7mm

8 months

One year ago-blunt trauma

Bony swelling

Surgical excision

No recurrence after two year follow up

2

19/M

Medial surface of middle phalanx of right middle finger

17x10x10mm

6 months

No History of trauma

Bony swelling with difficulty in extension of finger

Surgical excision

No recurrence after two year follow up

3

25/F

Lateral aspect of 1st metatarsal of right Foot

30x20x12mm

9 Months

10 month old history of blunt trauma

Occasionally painful and difficulty in fitting shoes

Surgical Excision

No recurrence after two year follow up

4

34/M

Proximal phalanx of right index finger

10x10x6mm

1 year

History of blunt trauma

Bony swelling causing difficulty in extension

Surgical Excision

Recurrence after one year

5

36/F

Lateral aspect of middle phalanx of the right middle finger

12x10x8mm

2 year

History of trauma

Painless bony swelling

Surgical Excision

No recurrence after two year follow up

6

32/M

Lateral aspect of proximal phalanx of left small finger

9x9x5mm

3 year

No history of trauma

Slowly progressive bony swelling

Surgical Excision

No recurrence after two year follow up

7

17/F

Volar aspect of distal ulna left wrist

35x30x25mm

3 year

No History of trauma

Progressive difficulty in moving wrist joint

Surgical Excision

No recurrence after two year follow up

8

14/M

Terminal phalanx of the left great toe

15x18x10mm

9 months

No history of trauma

Pain with Bony swelling

Surgical Excision

Recurrence after one year

Figure 1

BPOP of 5th Metacarpal and Intraoperative view

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b9915645-32c8-45a2-b452-de741ebeaeabimage1.png
Figure 2

Clinical image, Xray and MRI of Nora‘s lesion both Sagital & Coronal view

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b9915645-32c8-45a2-b452-de741ebeaeabimage2.png
Figure 3

Distal ulna Nora’s lesion

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b9915645-32c8-45a2-b452-de741ebeaeabimage3.png

Discussion

BPOP is a relatively rare disease that most commonly presents as a parosteal bony swelling in the short bones of the hands and feet. BPOP of the distal end of long bones is very uncommon. BPOP has no gender preference. 4 It can affect patients at any age, but most common in their 3rd and 4th decades.5, 3 Some chromosomal anomalies has been associated with BPOP including t(1;17) (q32;q21) and t(1;17) (q42;q23).6, 7

BPOP expands broadly in continuity with the cortical bone producing parosteal mass. BPOP is often confused with an osteochondroma as it is covered by a cartilage cap in some cases with no accompanying bony destruction. Because an osteochondroma occurs more often in the metaphyseal region of long bones, this association is particularly important.8 BPOP occasionally presents as calcification and ossification on X-ray. On MRI BPOP lesions lack continuity with the medullary cavity while osteochondroma maintain continuity with the medullary cavity. The margins of the BPOP lesion show low-signal intensity on T1-weighted images and a high-signal intensity on T2-weighted images. The lesion was not enhanced on MRI with gadolinium contrast done in two cases, suggesting the proliferation of cartilage cells.9

Surgery is performed in every case to excise the bony swelling with decortication of the underlying cortical bone to reduce the tumor recurrence rate. Biopsy sent for histopathological examination showed cartilage at the margins of the lesion, irregular mature bone or evidence of ossification just beneath, and bone formation at the base of the lesion.10 Because the marginal cartilage resembled reactive fibrocartilage, not the hyaline cartilage usually seen in the cartilage cap of osteochondromas, it was possible to distinguish the lesion from an osteochondroma. Additionally, the bone trabeculae were irregularly distributed, some being basophilic and incompletely ossified. There was a mixed area of bone, cartilage, and fibrous granulation tissue resembling a fracture callus. Though some of the chondrocytes had mild atypical features but there was no neoplastic production of osteoid tissue. Therefore, it was possible to differentiate BPOP lesions from malignant tumors, such as a parosteal or periosteal osteosarcoma.11, 12

BPOP has been reported to recur at high rates (20–55 %) after surgical resection. In general, observation alone is considered adequate for asymptomatic BPOP, but simple excision is indicated for patients with pain or dysfunction. Resection of the capsule of the lesion and decortication of the underlying cortical bone is reportedly important to reduce recurrence rates. Further long-term follow-up is warranted because recurrence is reported to occur from 10 months to 10 years (49 months on average) after surgery.4

Dorfman described a spectrum of reactive lesions of which the first stage is known as florid reactive periostitis and pathologically consists of spindle cells with minimal osteocartilaginous proliferation. Later, new bone and metaplastic cartilage become more prominent (Bizarre Parosteal Osteochondromatous Proliferation). Finally, the focus of ossification matures and a bony base is formed with a cartilage cap (Turret Exostosis). When located sublingually it is called a Subungual Exostosis.11

Radiographic differential diagnosis includes conventional Osteochondroma, Subungual Exostosis, Florid Reactive Periostitis, Myositis Ossificans, Turret Exostosis, Peripheral Chondrosarcoma, Periosteal, and Parosteal Osteosarcoma, and Periosteal Chondrosarcoma.10, 6, 13 Osteochondromas are uncommon in the small bones of hands and feet are not characterized by an intact cortex underneath as in BPOP.10 Because of its parosteal location, bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of bone should be distinguished from parosteal osteogenic sarcoma.9, 12 Parosteal osteosarcoma is rarely found in the hands and feet. It typically appears as a dense lobulated mass attached by a broad-based pedicle to the cortex and has heavy mineralization with a sclerotic appearance on plain films.

Conclusion

We are reporting 8 cases of BPOP of both upper and lower limb bones. The local recurrence rate after surgical resection of the lesion is high. One year after surgery, most of the patients had no complaints except recurrence in 2 patients. Further long-term follow-up of patients is needed to check for recurrence.

Consent

Written and informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this paper and any accompanying images.

Conflict of Interests

All authors have declared no conflict of interests.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

FE Nora DC Dahlin JW Beabout Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferations of the hands and feetAm J Surg Pathol1983732455010.1097/00000478-198304000-00003

2 

S Bandiera P Bacchini F Bertoni Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of boneSkeletal Radiol1998273154610.1007/s002560050355

3 

L Abramovici GC Steiner Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (Nora's lesion): A retrospective study of 12 cases, 2 arising in long bonesHuman Pathol2002331212051010.1053/hupa.2002.130103

4 

H Horiguchi M Sakane M Matsui Y Wadano Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (Nora's lesion) of the footPathol Int200151108162310.1046/j.1440-1827.2001.01271.x

5 

J.A. Harty P. Kelly D. Niall J.C. O'Keane M.M. Stephens Bizarre Parosteal Osteochondromatous Proliferation (Nora's Lesion) of the Sesamoid: a Case ReportFoot Ankle Int20002154081210.1177/107110070002100509

6 

M Soubeyrand G De Pinieu D Biau Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (Nora's lesion): two casesRev Chir Orthopédique Mot2007935494500

7 

O. Berber S. Dawson-Bowling A. Jalgaonkar J. Miles R. C. Pollock J. A. Skinner Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of boneJ Bone Joint Surg. Br201193-B811182110.1302/0301-620x.93b8.26349

8 

B Saygi E Karadag-Saygi C Erzik M Erkan Y Yildirim Bizarre Parosteal Osteochondromatous Proliferation of the Little ToeJ Am Podiatric Med Assoc20069621586110.7547/0960158

9 

M. Sundaram HA Domanski M Rotman R Howard A P Saboeiro Florid reactive periostitis and bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation: pre-biopsy imaging evolution, treatment and outcomeSkeletal Radiol2001304192810.1007/s002560100343

10 

M F Meneses K K Unni RG Swee Bizarre Parosteal Osteochondromatous Proliferation of Bone (Noraʼs Lesion)Am J Surg Pathol 1993177691710.1097/00000478-199307000-00006

11 

J L Soon H C Chang C S Sim L C Teoh C O Low A case of bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of the handSingapore Med J20034427

12 

M Endo T Hasegawa T Tashiro U Yamaguchi Y Morimoto F Nakatani Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation with a t(1;17) translocationVirchows Arch200544719910210.1007/s00428-005-1266-7

13 

D A Campanacci R Guarracino A Franchi R Capanna Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (Nora’s lesion). Description of six cases and a review of the literatureChir Organi Mov1999846571



jats-html.xsl

© This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.